Quick take

Invoice factoring and merchant cash advances (MCAs) both deliver fast working capital, but they solve different problems and carry different trade-offs. Factoring converts your unpaid invoices into cash and shifts collection risk (depending on recourse), while an MCA gives a lump sum repaid from future sales and often carries higher effective costs. Below I lay out how each works, how to compare true cost, eligibility and tax considerations, plus a practical checklist to help you decide.

How each product actually works

  • Invoice factoring: You sell eligible customer invoices to a factor, typically receiving an advance (commonly 70–95% of invoice value) within 24–72 hours. The factor collects the invoice from your customer and pays you the remainder (less fees and a holdback) when the invoice settles. Factoring can be recourse (you must repay if the customer defaults) or non-recourse (factor bears the credit risk for covered invoices).

  • Merchant cash advance: A lender gives a lump-sum payment in return for a future share of your card and sometimes ACH/debit sales. The agreement specifies a factor rate (for example, 1.15–1.5), not an interest rate. Repayment is made automatically as a fixed percentage of daily card receipts or by scheduled ACH. Daily remittance means payments scale with sales but can accelerate repayment and cost when volumes are high.

(For a deep dive on each, see the site’s pages on Invoice Factoring and Merchant Cash Advance.)

Internal links

Pros and cons — practical view

Invoice factoring

  • Pros: Immediate liquidity tied to receivables; generally lower effective cost than MCAs for businesses with reliable invoicing; can be available to companies with weak credit because approval depends largely on your customers’ credit.
  • Cons: You sell an asset (receivables), which can reduce your profit margin; customer-facing collections by a factor can affect relationships; recourse factoring leaves you on the hook if a customer doesn’t pay.

Merchant cash advance

  • Pros: Fast approval and funding; accessible to businesses with thin credit profiles if they have steady card volume; simple underwriting focused on daily sales.
  • Cons: Factor rates can translate into very high effective APRs when translated to annualized cost; daily remittances can squeeze cash flow in slow periods; fewer consumer protections and less transparency in pricing.

Comparing true cost — a simple method

MCA pricing uses a factor rate, not interest. That makes apples-to-apples comparisons harder. Use this three-step approach to compare:

  1. Calculate total payback. For an MCA: advance x factor rate = total amount repaid (for example, $50,000 x 1.25 = $62,500 total). For factoring: add fees (discount rate on invoiced amount + any flat fees) to determine net proceeds and cost.
  2. Estimate outstanding days. Decide how long, on average, the MCA or factoring draw will be outstanding (e.g., 6 months or 180 days). For factoring, use invoice aging; for MCAs, use your expected payoff period based on projected sales and holdback percentage.
  3. Annualize to get an APR-like comparison. Approximate APR = (Total cost / Net proceeds) x (365 / average days outstanding). This is an approximation but helps compare options. Many MCAs show factor rates that translate to triple-digit APRs for short durations, so run the math before signing.

Note: Lenders may present effective terms differently; always ask for the total repayment schedule and an example showing a realistic payoff period.

Eligibility and who benefits most

  • Invoice factoring fits B2B companies with sizable receivables and customers that pay on terms (e.g., manufacturers, wholesalers, B2B service providers). Newer businesses may qualify if their customers are creditworthy.
  • MCAs suit retail, restaurant, or service businesses with consistent daily card/swipe volume and an urgent need for flexibility, but accept higher financing cost.

Tax and accounting considerations

  • Factoring: This is a sale of an asset (receivables). How it’s treated on your balance sheet and taxes depends on whether the transaction meets the accounting definition of a sale and whether it’s recourse or non-recourse. Talk to your CPA—tax treatment can vary (see IRS guidance for small businesses at https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed).

  • MCA: Most providers structure MCAs as purchase agreements for a portion of future sales, not loans. For tax and bookkeeping, proceeds are usually reported as business income or liability depending on structure; again, confirm with your tax advisor.

Practical negotiation and due-diligence checklist

  1. Get the total payback number in writing and a sample amortization for a realistic payoff period.
  2. For factoring, clarify recourse vs non-recourse, fees, reserve holdbacks, and who handles collections.
  3. For MCAs, translate the factor rate into total dollars repaid and run the APR approximation above.
  4. Ask about holdbacks, termination fees, ACH blocks, and any daily remittance caps that could impact operations.
  5. Confirm whether the provider requires personal guarantees or cross-collateralization.
  6. Check lender reputation—use reviews, Better Business Bureau, and references. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has resources warning small businesses about MCA costs and opaque disclosures (https://www.consumerfinance.gov).
  7. Run the numbers against alternatives: lines of credit, short-term bank loans, or SBA-backed options that may be cheaper for many firms.

Common mistakes I see owners make

  • Failing to annualize MCA costs, which masks the true expense.
  • Confusing factoring with a loan; factoring is the sale of receivables and can change how your balance sheet looks.
  • Letting an MCA’s quick funding blind them to the long-term cash-flow drag caused by daily remittances.

When to choose one over the other

  • Choose invoice factoring if: you have dependable B2B invoices, need to preserve credit lines, and want a financing cost that scales with your receivables cycle.
  • Choose an MCA only if: you have strong, predictable card volume, need immediate access to operating cash, and have no lower-cost options — but only after confirming the true cost and stress-testing cash flow in a slow month.

Final advice and next steps

Run a side-by-side cash-flow projection for the period you expect to repay (3–12 months). Compare total dollars repaid and worst-case monthly cash outflows. If the total cost or the cash-flow risk looks unacceptable, explore alternatives: business lines of credit, short-term bank loans, SBA microloans, or vendor financing.

For more context on short-term alternatives and how lenders evaluate creditworthiness, see our guides on short-term invoice financing and merchant cash advances on FinHelp (internal links above).

Professional disclaimer

This article is educational and not individualized financial or tax advice. Terms vary widely between providers; consult a CPA or qualified financial advisor before signing any agreement. For regulatory or consumer protection concerns, visit the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (https://www.consumerfinance.gov) or your state banking regulator.

Author note

In my 15+ years advising small businesses, I’ve found that careful number-crunching and conservative cash-flow stress tests prevent most post-funding surprises. If you’d like, use the checklist above to gather quotes and I can help interpret the numbers.

Authoritative sources